Kodak Gold 200 Vs Fuji Superia 400

The main difference between these two are the tones Kodak Ultramax 400 is much warmer with reddish tones slightly more contrast while FujiFilm Superia X-TRA 400 is cooler with magenta greenish tones. Kodak Gold 200 is a daylight balanced film.


Fujifilm Superia X Tra 400 Film Stock Review Filtergrade Film Stock Film Filtergrade

Today were going to compare the two most popular and affordable 35mm colored films.

Kodak gold 200 vs fuji superia 400. Im Using both Kodak Gold 200 and Fuji Superia 200 but Superia its better than Kodak Gold 200. I find the red spectrum in Superia a bit dull. For Kodak you now have the choice of Portra 160 400 or 800 or Ektar 100.

Occasionally I also use Kodak Colorplus 200 alongside Fuji products. Comparing Cheap Film Kodak Gold 200 vs Fuji Superia 400 - YouTube. Defiantly Fuji film Superia200 its the best film ever made.

Fuji Superia X Tra 400 Vs Kodak Ultramax Stock Comparison Shoot It With Kodak Colorplus 200 Vs Fujicolor C200 Wonderfoto Fuji C200 Ve Kodak Colorplus 200 Karşılaştırması You. The best ISO400 film Ive tried is Lomographys 400CN but even that isnt stunning. Availability info from BH.

Other than the big two BH carries Agfa plus two other Cinestill and Lomography neither of which Ive heard of. And Superia 100 is absolutely glorious film and in my experience a different class to Superia 400. Both have similar contrast but Ultramax seems to.

While I havent pushed Kodak Gold film I have pushed Fuji Superia 400 another widely available relatively inexpensive consumer film two stops to 1600 on a few occasions. Also believe it or not the Fuji and Kodak 200 speed neg film is NOT finer grained than the 400 speed emulsions. It is not fussy at all but I would recommend no underexposing it too much or grain could become an issue.

To me I found the Superia to have more saturated colors than Kodak Gold equivalents. The Color Balance Film Speed And Grain Of Kodak Gold 200 Colors. This can be advantage to Superia in some cases as.

Its colors are saturated and rich and tend to be warmer than Fuji consumer films. Personally Id load up on Superia 400 for landscapesscenics with a few rolls of 800 for low light shots and maybe a roll or 2 of the 200 for portraits. All the RD has gone into the faster films the old rules no longer apply.

This article interested me very much as I still like using my film cameras and regularly use C200 Superia 400 and the re-branded Agfa Vista 200. But it is also 50 more expensive on 36ex rolls. Superia 200 its great film especially for landscape and greens are very vivid colours.

I prefer Royal Gold over Superia at the 400 speed. The results are very much as described in this article such as enhanced saturation and. The most noticeable difference between Fuji Superia and Kodak Ultramax is the in the orange channel.

Its a shame that Fujifilm no longer produces the beloved 400H anymore. Kodak Gold 200 Colorplus Ultramax 400 Pro Image 100 Fuji Fujicolor Superia Premium 400h Color Negative 35mm Roll 24 36 Exposures For M35 M38 Vibe 501f Dl 8 Camera Lazada Fuji Superia X Tra 400 Vs Kodak Ultramax Stock Comparison Shoot It With. Natural light sources are a huge component to film photography folks.

Comparing Cheap Film Kodak Gold 200 vs Fuji Superia 400. I find the Kodak 200 and 400 to be a little more grainier than their Superia counterparts at 200 and 400 respectively. Fuji Superia has less grain and 400 speed.

Ive often heard of people preferring Fujfilm for product still shots whereas Kodak was always designed for a meaningful portrait ie. Right now Kodak has two very good lower cost films in the color negative category. They all provide the level of quality i am happy with though I am alarmed at the reduction in choice of film stocks.

Gold at 200 speed Ultramax at 400. Were comparing side-by-side the Fujicolor C200 and Kodak ColorPlus 20. Also same for Gold 200 vs say Paortra 400VC.

If you prefer more natural color renditions you may. It also renders skin tones beautifully. I prefer the Kodak Gold color rendition to Fuji.

Kodak approximates more to faithful colors. If you are attracted to saturated colors with more contrast as I am Fuji Superia may be your choice. Superia renders those colors especially seen in the shadows as greener while Ultramax renders them as more magenta.

Go to the Fuji and Kodak sites and you will see this is true. For example Superia 200 and 400 have the same RMS grain rating now. For Fuji it looks likes the only choice you have is Superia 400.

Superia 200 and even more so the supposedly budget FujiColor C200 have given me far better and far more consistent results than Superia 400. And Gold 200 has a grainier PGI grain rating than 400UCVCNC. In my observations the difference between 200 and 400 speed print film is very slight if any when comparing grain and colour.

The 200 has lower color saturationcontrast. I still lament the discontinuation of Superia 100 and Kodak Gold 100.


Olympus Mju Ii Kodak Colorplus 200 Analog Vintage Film Photography Film Camera Photography Film Photography


Tokyo Street Near Shibuya At Night Canon Ae 1 Fujifilm Superia X Tra 400 Cinematic Photography Film Photography 35mm 35mm Photography


The Best 35mm Film I Shot And Reviewed 12 Rolls Best 35mm Film Film Photography 35mm 35mm Film


Set Of 6 35mm Film Can Magnets Etsy 35mm Film Film Camera 35mm Film


Stockholm Travel Story On 35mm Film Shoot It With Film Film Photography 35mm Travel Film Photography Film Photography


LihatTutupKomentar